Sunday, May 20, 2012

The Native American War for Independence: Tenskwatawa, Tecumseh, and the War of 1812

The War of 1812 has been called the "forgotten war," and it's place in American history is ongoing changes as its bicentennial observation gets underway. The War of 1812 may be thought of as three different wars: the naval war against the British (John Paul Jones and the USS Constitution--"Old Ironsides"); the resistance to the war demonstrated in New England (the abortive Hartford Convention, which discussed secession 50 years before the southern slave states temporarily formed the Confederate States); and lastly, but more importantly to us in the Midwest, the war in the interior of the country fought between whites and Native Americans and their British allies. As a result of the outcome of the War of 1812, the Native American confederacy that had been building since the establishment of settlement at Greenville of the Shawnee Prophet Tenskwatawa disintegrated, and active opposition to further white settlement in the Great Lakes region vanished with it.

That opposition was centered on two Shawnee men, brothers we know as Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa. For many years, it was thought by white scholars that Tecumseh was the leader of this movement--Tecumseh was acknowledged by most as a brilliant warrior and leader of men in battle. Tenskwatawa, the Shawnee Prophet, on the other hand, was depicted by whites as  cunning, underhanded usurper, who in his drive to take over Tecumseh's movement undercut his brother's efforts with an ill-fated attack on American militia forces near the confluence of the Tippecanoe and  Wabash Rivers in November 1811--the opening shots of the War of 1812 in the Great Lakes region. During the last thirty years or so, however, this interpretation has undergone extensive revision, beginning with the biography of Tenskwatawa by R. David Edmonds, and most recently with the account of the relationship between William Henry Harrison and Tenskwatawa by Adam Jortner. The reasons for this reinterpretation are various, but are largely due to the re-assessment of the sources that scholars have long relied upon to shape this story.

Before we tackle the reinterpretation, however, we need to lay out the basic facts as best we can. In the Great Lakes region--or the pays d'en haut as French voyageurs called it--was a region in a great deal of flux because of the changes caused by white contact with various native peoples. Those closest to the coast were effected earliest, but eventually most native peoples sought contact with Europeans for the trade goods they were willing to exchange for animal pelts--especially beaver. This desire for trade goods increased conflicts between native peoples; some of the trade goods obtained, in particular firearms, made this conflict more deadly. To escape the violence, many native peoples moved to the interior of the country--where they had to learn to co-exist with the native peoples already living there.

 Among the native peoples already living in the Great Lakes regions were the Shawnee people. The Shawnee, in fact, had recently moved back into what whites were now calling the Ohio country--the had fled the earlier carnage caused by the attack of the Iroquois Confederacy on the Wendot (later known as the Hurons and Wyandottes) people during an earlier conflict. Many scholars believe that Shawnee to be the descendants of the so-called Fort Ancient peoples, responsible for the construction of many of the mound structures around Ohio. Once the group returned to Ohio, many proved reluctant to move again; the Shawnee attempted to make strategic allies with whites that would allow them to continue to control the land on which they lived; the Shawnee allied with the British in the French and Indian War, for example--but were among the earliest allies of the Ottawa chief Pontiac in his attempt to confederate all native groups into a single force to remove white settler from what they considered their land.

We believe that in 1768, Tecumseh was born in Old Piqua, on the Mad River, into a large family headed by Puckshinwa and Methotaske. By 1774, the ongoing conflict claimed the life of Puckshinwa at the Battle of Point Pleasant; the following spring, Methotase gave birth to the last of their children from the relationship--triplets, including one called Lalawethicka (which translates into "the Rattle"). By 1780, the boy's mother had abandoned her children to the care of her eldest daughter, and moved west to escape the constant threat of violence. After abandoning the battlefield in his first conflict in 1782, Tecumseh vowed such an occurrence would never happen again. Tecumseh later took part in the native defeats of American army forces under the command of both of both Josiah Harmar and Arthur St. Clair; Tecumseh and Lalawethicka were both also present at the defeat of native forces at the Battle of Fallen Timbers in 1794. Tecumseh refused to sign the Treaty of Greenville, however, and moved his small band, including his brother, to a settlement near present-day Anderson, Indiana,

Here the group foundered--especially Lalawethicka, who seems to have attempted to drown his troubles in alcohol. Just after one such bout, Lalawethicka became unconscious while attempting to light his pipe in the fire; tradition has it that he had to in fact be lifted out of the fire by his family. Lalawethicka remained unconscious for an extended period of time--long enough, in fact to convince his family that he had passed away. As they were preparing his body for burial, however, he awakened with an astonishing tale of passing into a realm beyond Earth, and having a conversation with the Great Spirit, who told him that all native peoples had to reform their ways or suffer an excruciating eternal damnation.

Tenskwatawa (as Lalawethicka began calling himself--the name means "the Open Door") called for native peoples to give up all European trade goods, especially alcohol, and return to "traditional ways of life." He soon claimed that the Great Spirit had informed him that he should establish a settlement at Greenville, Ohio to proselytize to other native peoples. Greenville was, of course, the site of the treaty signing took place, and despite denials seems to have been an act to provoke a response from both the Ohio state government and the federal government, The move to Greenville coincided with Willliam Henry Harrison's negotiation of the Treaty of Fort Wayne in 1805. Harrison saw this as a means to consolidate his political position in the Indiana Territory (soon to be a state, Harrison hoped). Native peoples saw the treaty in an entirely different light, of course, and sought leaders who promised to put a stop to the cessation of land to whites--just what Tenskwatawa was advocating in Greenville. Soon, many whites in Ohio were in a panic over the number of Native peoples going to  Greenville, and were attempting to persuade both the federal government and the state of Ohio to intervene. Neither governmental body was willing to do so, however, because of the cost involved. Not all whites were convinced that Tenskwatawa was up to some nefarious plan, either; visiting Shakers came away convinced that Greenville had been transformed into a "holy place."

The majority of whites were made uncomfortable by the large numbers of native peoples traveling to Greenville, and continued to pressure the government of Ohio to act. Fortunately, it was about this time that the Great Spirit informed Tenskwatawa that his village should be moved to a new place--on the Tippecanoe River, near where it empties into the Wabash. This moved Tenskwatawa closer to many of his native allies--but also closer to the strongest voice calling for the disbandment of the Prophet's village, William Henry Harrison. The establishment of this new settlement, known to whites as Prophetstown, was a direct challenge to Harrison's plans for the territory--and a threat to his economic well-being, as well, since he had invested a considerable sum in purchasing much of the land his treaty negotiations had "acquired" from Native Americans. It was these conflicts that led to the War of 1812 in the Great Lakes region.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa, Myth and History

I. Tecumseh's Death and His Mythologizing

A. Death's Blessings--in many ways, the death of Tecumseh helped solidify his standing, particularly since his death freed him of the responsibility for the military pursuit he was attempting to promote. This phenomenon can be seen in the careers of many "great Americans."

1. Abraham Lincoln--Lincoln's assassination came just a week after the victory of the Union over the Confederacy, and has meant that he has received much of the credit for that victory. His death also meant that he avoided the difficulties that presented Andrew Johnson so many difficulties, including the political problems with the Radical Republicans (which Lincoln undoubtedly would have faced as well).

2. Contrast with Ulysses Grant--by way of contrast, Grant was a great hero at the end of the war--so much so that the country (or, at least, the Republican Party) turned to him to be president after the conflicts of the Johnson years. But his two terms as President were marked by corruption, which has damaged his reputation.

3. Tenskwatawa--Essentially, Tenskwatawa bore the brunt of Tecumseh's defeat. The Battle of Thames took place in early October 1813. With the defeat, keeping approximately 1,000 Native Americans became the responsibility of Tenskwatawa alone. He was able to accomplish this, but the history books have not seen fit to recognize this as much of an accomplishment. Instead, the post-war narrative of Tenskwatawa's story emphasizes his return to drink, his turn to accommodationist politics after his return to the United States, his failure to realize his dream.

II. Inevitably and Historical Contingency

A. Historical Inevitability--the trend of the study of history until recently was to argue that historical events happened because it was inevitable that they happen that way--that, in fact, there could be no other outcome. This argument has a lot of intuitive power. It is difficult to imagine different outcomes, because those outcomes did not in fact happen--and it is easy to believe that these outcomes were some way destined to happen.

B. Historical Contingency--Most historians today argue for the idea of historical contingency--that events in the past happen for specific reasons, but that at the same time these reasons shift in importance as our relationship to the past changes; we come to see particular causes become more important than others. Historians today also favor arguments that recognize the role that accident plays in historical events

C. Tecumseh and Tenskwatawa--The brothers were reacting to the circumstances that they saw threatening their traditional way of life. To combat this threat, they used both aspects of traditional culture, and innovations they created, to try to achieve this. While recognizing that ultimately this effort failed, it is important to recognize how close it came to working. While circumstances ultimately worked against them, the brothers refused to accept that they could not change those circumstances.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Written Assignment 16

The first written assignment asked you to define "great." Has what you learned in this class caused you to revisit that definition? Do Tenskwatawa and/or Tecumseh meet that definition? Why, or why not?

Written Assignment 15

The assigned readings for this course, particularly R. David Edmunds The Shawnee Prophet and John Sugden's Tecumseh: A Life were the opening of an effort to reinterpret the lives of Tenskwatawa and Tecumseh. As such, they both broke new ground, and re-hashed old arguments. From what you have learned during this course, I would like to to assess both books--what new interpretations did the authors put forth, and what interpretations did they continue to accept as true? Do you agree with their choices? Why?

Written Assignment 14

Primary sources are the life's blood of history, but can often mislead as much as enlighten the study of events. This phenomenon we have discussed at various points in the semester when we talked about the reinterpretation of historical sources. Using primarily the documents provided during lectures on this blog, in what ways have the documents there enlightened our study of Tenskwatawa and Tecumseh--and in what way have they misled historians?

The War of 1812

I. Reasons for the War

A. The War Hawks--a relatively small group of Congressmen--all of them too young to have participated in the War of Independence--forced the issue on the Madison administration.

1. Unpopularity of Madison--Republican politicians did not trust Madison (who was, after all, a reformed Federalist). Madison, while a brilliant political theorist, was far less successful as a politician. A group of War Hawks called on Madison in the new Executive Mansion, and threatened to nominate another candidate against Madison if he did not agree to support the declaration of war.

2.Expansionary Ideology--the War Hawk were among the earliest proponents of the idea of Manifest Destiny, and looked not only to add land in the Northwest and the Southwest--but in Canada, as well.

B. Opposition to the war--the position of the War Hawks was in the minority, compared to the rest of the country.

1. New England--Much of the opposition to the war between the United States and Great Britain was centered in New England. This region had the closest cultural ties with Great Britain, and also the closest economic ties; much of the trade of the region was directly tied to Great Britain, and people in the region realized that a war would disrupt that trade. Religious ties between England and New England led to mutual recriminations against the Roman Catholics/atheists in France, as well.

2. Great Lakes Region--Surprisingly, support for the coming war was rather soft in this region, as well. In part, the reasons for this lack of support was that many thought (rightly) that much of the war would be fought in the region, which threatened their property and lives. The enthusiasm generated for the war in the region mainly came from politicians, who saw a successful conclusion to the war as a means of building political support.

3. The Old Southwest--perhaps the greatest general support for the war among the citizenry was generated in the Old Southwest (Tennessee, western Georgia, Alabama, and Louisiana), who saw this as a mean of expanding slavery, and therefore economic opportunities for whites. The southwest also had a charismatic leader at the head of the militia, Andrew Jackson, who inspired greater confidence in his forces.

II. Rebuilding the Coalition (Again)

A. Re-emergence of Prophetstown--within weeks of its destruction, Prophetstown was being rebuilt, and Native Americans were flocking there to hear what the Prophet had to say--and many were joining the movement. Harrison's attack on Prophetstown had sown the seeds of renewal for the movement, as it became apparent to most observers.

1. Resurgent numbers--before the outbreak of hostilities, there were probably somewhere between 5000 and 8000 Native Americans present at Prophetstown--and this would not have included  the group of warriors now under the command of Tecumseh, who by this time had returned from his southern journey and traveled to Amherstburg to obtain supplies, largely weapons, for this warriors.

III. Fighting the War

A.The Ohio/Kentucky/Michigan militia--most of the US forces were temporary soldiers--members of the militia, who generally elected their officers, and often were not well-schooled in military tactics. During this war, as well, some called into question the authority of the officers--or even the President himself--to send them to fight in a foreign county.

B. Fall of Detroit--a force under the command of William Hull, governor of the Michigan Territory, surrendered the fort and the city to forces under the joint command of Gen. Isaac Brock, in large part because of his fear that defeat (which seemed inevitable to Hull) would mean a general massacre of the residents of Detroit without the British protection that he was able to procure.

C. Battle of Lake Erie--the decisive battle of the entire war. When Perry defeated to naval fleet, it meant that the war in the interior turned in favor of the Americans, who could suddenly supply their army, and the British forces could not obtain supplies

D. Battle of the Thames--Isaac Brock had been killed earlier in the was (after the surrender of Detroit), and was replaced by Colonel Proctor. Proctor, upon hearing about the loss on Lake Erie, decided (rightly, in my opinion), that his position at the western edge of Canada was untenable, and decided o retreat toward York (present day Toronto). Tecumseh challenged Proctor to remain and fight, but to little avail. British forces abandoned their Indian allies, and Tecumseh was killed during the ensuing battle.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

The Aftermath of Tippecanoe

I. American Victory?

A. Harrison Defending His Decisions--With the Native American reaction to what they perceived to be an unprovoked attack on Prophetstown, the decision of Harrison to lead a large unit against the settlement there (and not immediately attack) was called into question.



B. Band of Brothers


C. Harrison's Continued Defense


...continues into January 1812...



D. The Disposition of the Native Americans After the Attack on Prophetstown



E. Harrison in Command